The Great Disruption
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Published March 11th 2009
This column got a lot of feedback from New York Times readers. I am thinking of calling Chapter 18 "The Great Disruption." I am coming to the conclusion that the market and Mother Nature both hit the wall here in 2008/2009. We need growth, we need ways to raise people's standards of living, but what will be the new ways we should focus on—post-The Great Disruption—that will allow us to grow people's living standards in a more sustainable and regenerative way?
Ideas:
Uncle Sam needs a Few Green Men...
I can hear the little green men in their UFOs talking as they survey our planet.
What are they doing ! They are cutting down everything their sun has provided them and they are burning it up...clouds of smoke that will turn their home into Saturn.
We have explored the the star spangled dark matter and have stumbled upon this beautiful blue and green planet and the most intelligent species is turning it brown and hazy.
They have discovered the power of the stars and have stored it in underground silos pointed at each other.
They are running pipes and wires underground and bury half of everything the have made.
They are a strange creature since dwelling in caves and finding fire.... they are still living buy the flame.
I wish we could see what is going on out there in the waterless zone but the sun is being reflected back in our eyes and we can not see what those strange metal sheets and towers are for.
Maybe they are actually beginning to evolve....Must be the little green shoots in all of us.
Maybe the grays have left the milky way.
May 13th 2009, 1:10 am
"-to grow people's standard of living in a sustainable and regenerative way." Is that a goal of the U. S.? I would love to think that it is the main goal of this country to improve the standard of living for greatest number of our citizens. If the President would just make that announcement there would be no stopping us. Everywhere you turn, in a competitive environment, you will find leaders announcing goals. That gets the people pointed in the same direction.
May 7th 2009, 8:24 pm
Amazingly, we have the technology for sustainable growth right now. It was developed as part of the largest energy research project in the history of the world. A billion dollar, 10 year program by the government from 1984 to 1994 that succeeded beyond all scientists' wildest dreams. It promised unlimited clean energy-- and a way to dispose of our nuclear waste! But the project was cancelled by secretary of energy Hazel O'Leary in 1994-- three years before completion. The facility was dismantled, and the scientists were ordered not to publicize the project. It went almost forgotten-- until now.
http://bravenewclimate.com/2008/12/13/integra...
May 6th 2009, 7:03 am
I commend everyone's attention to this fine interview with Severn Suzuki. http://www.guernicamag.com/interviews/961/we_...
May 5th 2009, 12:31 pm
While you are writing and thinking about market and mother nature and its current state, I would urge you to look at the extreme human inequality that exists in this world for hundred's of years. We have lived thru peril of nature and complexities of markets. For the first time in history it seems that both have hit the wall, and we are at the brink of unacceptable inflection points. But at the same time the human conditions in some parts of the world has continued to be extreme while rest of the planet has enjoyed prosperity and extravagance of resources.
Can we talk about change at a spiritual level, can we talk about change at a cultural level, to accept equality in terms of food and housing. Is it too much to expect for a human being in some mainstream parts of this world to have two square meals, while the west is worried about their Chryslers and GM's , United Airlines and JP Morgan's.
Please spare 6 minutes of your life and watch this film. Over 2,800,000 people have watched and shared this film, who care about human inequality - all who care about hunger and its impact on human race.
----------------------------------
THE FILM : It is a TRUE STORY
Chicken a la Carte
Director: Ferdinand Dimadura | Genre: Drama |
http://www.cultureunplugged.com/play/1081/Chi...
This film is about the hunger and poverty brought about by Globalization. There are 10,000 people dying everyday due to hunger and malnutrition. This short film shows a forgotten portion of the society. The people who lives on the refuse of men to survive. What is inspiring is the hope and spirituality that never left this people.
May 4th 2009, 9:54 am
HOT...FLAT...CROWDED...AND BROKE
(Every cloud has a silver lining)
Broke...a relative term. What if your energy costs doubled while you just lost your net worth and now your job.. Hot flat and crowded ...and you are now broke ....sounds like an unemployment line or worse...a food line.
The US service economy was once full of servants and now filling up with those that need to be served.Maybe an end result will be suburbia turning into small towns and real neighborhoods ...away from the individual islands of survivors that escaped from the interaction of community life.
Just as the outsourcing to other countries brought their populations to urban life, it may, as well, also bring America back to its roots.Just as paper wealth ,the social well being of the nation was inflated and created ...like a lot of hot air ....a rising balloon of prosperity.
When I grew up in the fifties....it took a community to raise a child....not to mention all those old ladies in their social clubs that I am sure were funded by the CIA.Accountability was directly proportional to the number of people who knew you and in a true community or neighborhood...it was like the CIA was there....everybody knew somebody was watching...and cared.
Hot,flat,crowed,and broke is what built America ; and what also is building the rest of the developing world.Yes, America is a developing country....and at the same time we are trying to develop a developed world....thousand of years old.Without hot,flat,and crowded, the resources of the earth cannot be properly shared and there will be a lack of accountability.
The industrial revolution was hot,flat,and crowded ...and the masses were broke until they figured out that they only needed to hold the drivers of that bus accountable....bring them back into the community.
The financial weapons of mass destruction may be the instrument of Global Community Construction...the economic equivalent of the Big Bang....the event they look back on fifty years from now as the beginning of the new world order....global cooperation....the beginning of the end of world suburbia and the start of a Global Community... a Human Evolution...and a Green Resolution.
Maybe it is the event that stopped the economic and resource dust storm of technology and turned it into a rainbow of opportunity...the yellow...blue...and green....instead of the hazy and gray skies of today's modern world.
Maybe we all did not lose our wealth but just put a down payment on a brighter future...one where it does not have to rain to see rainbows.....we will have to call it the silver lining !
Besides... our pot of gold is on the other side of the rainbow ...created under the clouds with a silver lining .
Put on you sunglasses...the ones with the green lenses !
May 3rd 2009, 4:49 pm
An idea that has captured my imagination is this...the industry of the future, the one that will yield both sustainability and decent wages for millions (or more) workers will be actually caring for the planet. Not simply today's industries of disposing of waste or building "greener" products but of actually maintaining the health of the Earth. Like a giant "landscaping" crew with each community (no reason this could not be private enterprise on a local level, of course) doing its part to enhance the health of the planet. It strikes me a a whole new industry. Again this isn't about mitigation of damage but about helping the ecosystem perform better and last longer because it is in better health...sort of like personal trainers for the environment.
May 1st 2009, 9:21 am
THE EAGLE HAS NOT LANDED
I am pragmatic by nature....something I was just born with...what if ? and why not ? is my operational compass and people I am sure think I am just critical or a little out there.
I want a sustainable house. I want a house that each year will pay a return from energy savings to the point where the savings will eventually make my house payment and eventually provide income for retirement.
We set a mission to the moon when I was 10...I heard president Kennedy`s speech....man to the moon in ten years...I was naive...I believed him !
After all... growing up with the threat of the H bomb ending the world... I was sure this was an acceptable goal, ESPECIALLY IF WE WERE GOING TO BLOW UP THE WORLD !
By the time I was 19 we had been to the moon and at the first campus Earth Day they were talking about how solar energy would be powering the cities in five years.That was 40 years ago !
Ironic the year we landed on the moon... Earth Day was launched....perhaps we appreciated our home planet a little more after seeing it from the moon ; and not turn it into a moon.
Surely if the military industrial complex can blow up the world and put a man on the moon it could advance us beyond coal fired electric plants and diesel fueled commerce.
CAPITALISM got in the way......goals have been replaced by profit...the countries goals have been outsourced to the private sector where profit has to be the primary object to use to borrow money to be solvent.
The most successful advancements of mankind were socialistic implementation of private invention and imagination...a government implementation and advancement of technological gains....a national goal !
If profit had to come first it would never get built....why do you think credit was established in the first place.....think of taxes as a loan payment because that is what they really are.a loan for a national goal.
We need an Energy Goal...a simple statement and a date.AN INCONVENIENT GOAL !
I do not want a house of cards... I want a space ship here on Mother Earth...my space that is self sufficient....it will sustain me financially not just be made of sustainable materials.
If a sustainable home is from recyclable materials... why don`t the call it a disposable home...probably hard to sell !
I am not asking for the moon.....just a return on my investment that cannot be taken away from me by weapons of mass destruction...CDS....or ICE... the increasing cost of energy.
The Green I want is more Green in my pocket...now that is Capitalism !
Create a home that is energy self sustaining and better yet energy providing...let it sustain itself...charge my car and sell electrons back to the mother ship.
Think of all the infrastructure costs they would save.
A self sustaining home would have no pipes or wires running to it...a true Architects Dream...just form and function.
I bet this could be done in less than a year if we just decided to do it.
HOW DOES THE SPACE STATION SURVIVE WITHOUT WIRES AND PIPES FROM EARTH
The infrastructure underground would be unnecessary...think of the savings.
I think it is time we we launch all this space technology from Home Depot !
What IF ? ....... Why Not !.....The men who discovered fossil fuels are now fossils and the technology from the space program was one small step for man and one giant step for mankind..... took off from the moon... but..... has not landed in my yard.
And we refer to ourselves as intelligent.
We better worry about something really important like...... WATER !
Oh Yea.......we bottled it so it could be sold at a great profit. Now the goal is what to do with all those empty bottles.
The American Dream...Marketing....it is the only thing that will turns us GREEN !
Is the Green revolution just a ploy to make some green money...now that would be marketable !
REMARKABLE !
GREEN....JUST A FEW LETTERS PAST GREED....WHAT REALLY SUSTAINS US !
If we had funded alternative fuels as we funded NASA everyone could be an astronaut with their own spaceship...a sustainable home !
Then we could just stay on Mother Earth a little longer.We need to make Earth Day and Green more meaningful....maybe a new song from .....GREENDAY....I HOPE YOU CAN SUSTAIN YOUR LIFE !
GREEN....IT IS THE COLOR THAT MEANS...PROCEED !
SOLAR ENERGY...WE WILL NEED IT TO DISTILL OUR POLLUTED WATER WAYS !
OF COURSE WE NEVER HAD OUR MOON GOAL UNTIL THE RUSSIANS PUT SPUTNIK INTO ORBIT.
MAYBE WE COULD LEAD FOR A CHANGE......THE AUDACITY OF HOPE !
WE WILL HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL WE ARE HOT ,FLAT,AND CROWDED ......LIKE BEING FORCED TO CAR POOL IN A GREEN HYBRID FIAT WITHOUT AIR CONDITIONING.
April 26th 2009, 11:53 am
Some passing thoughts:
1. If all the energy in the world is a constant and all the different kinds of energy get converted to heat energy, why can't we try harnessing this heat energy to convert it back into the energy we need. Wouldn't it be a two-in-one solution? Yeah, I know it's not feasible. But, there could be some way.
2. Ozone is getting depleted in the stratosphere. Ozone is building in the atmosphere. Why can't we efficiently channel out ozone to right where it belongs? Again, may not be feasible... But, with research, what if it is possible?
3. We need activism. But, we also need to bring in eco-friendly activism. In a bid to create awareness, recently, an Earth Hour was organized by the WWF. The ambassadors of Earth Hour were seen holding candles and asking the public to switch off lights for one hour. Then, the public switched off the light in many major cities and rode their cars, SUVs and two-wheelers to gather somewhere and "celebrate" Earth Hour by burning candles. Which procedure leaves more carbon footprint? Riding a car or using the electric fan? Burning a candle or lighting your home? Isn't the public confused about the whole thing with all the different "green" activism out there? The present activism surrounding "green" is only a choice of better evil. But, that's not what we want. We need no evil at all.
More thoughts by Suhail Rasheed on http://suhailrasheed.wordpress.com/
April 23rd 2009, 10:13 pm
The US service economy was born with reduced wages but compensated with easy credit to replace purchasing power and cheaper goods provided by imports and merchandising of box stores eliminating profitable independent and regional retailers.
Once the financial weapons of mass destruction could no longer be fueled by consumer and mortgage debt ,the credit engine seized.....the wheels of commerce slowed and the consumer economy drifted into a coma.
The year the earth stood still had began....US investors as well as world investors have lost half their wealth....credit has become a premium...third world manufacturers without orders ...and politicians doing only what they know raise taxes...borrow....and spend to jump start the credit cycle.
Now ,we are l eft with a world in bankruptcy.....but no global uniform laws to equate the pain and resolutions.....so the G 20 meets to share the blame and find new rules to start the game.
The developed world built a lot of homes and the developing world sold a lot of commodities...and the Chinese have money in the bank but an expanding population with little housing or food.
The world will reset.....and the developed world will have to find away to attract capital to pay their debt and recycle their consumer economy into a sustainable green world because the shopping spree is over.
The Day the Earth Turns Green
Green Acres Is The Place To Be.......for a sustainable life.The malls of today will be the solar power plants and farmers markets of tomorrow and the consumer economy will be reestablished .... where your status will be how much stuff you have gotten rid of instead of how much you have borrowed to by more stuff.
Your stuff or lack of it will still define you.....what was once something you had to have is now viewed as a waste of resources.It will not be the cost of the merchandise but the disposal costs that will help you live a sustainable life.
Life is a terrible thing to waste....don`t waste it on stuff and the cost to get rid of it.
Green technology ....may mean.......having money in your pocket.
Maybe a Green Life can cover the current world that is in Red Ink.
Cap and Trade will replace credit and your social status will be measured by the size of your carbon foot print.
It will not be the size of your house that will impress but how much energy it can sell back to the Carbon Bank.
The Day The Earth Turns Green
The new economic factor in you life will... not be your credit score ..but... your energy credits.
Energy ....it is what stuff is made of.
Now....Go Sustain Yourself .....little green men are turning up everywhere.
Energy is neither created or destroyed....it just changes color.
April 23rd 2009, 3:36 pm
As a long time fan and follower of Thomas Friedman's work I have been enthralled by the message in the chapters of 'Hot, Flat and Crowded'. I have been personally moved to share the following story with those of you have embarked on the train of thought that Tom is driving towards the future.
I was born in South Africa and during one of my lifetimes there participated in the operation of what was known as a 'trading store'. This was a general store located just outside a tribal region of KwaZulu Natal known as the Valley of a Thousand Hills.
Products sold included general merchandise, food and clothing. Customers included domestic workers that were employed by local residents as well as 'tourists' who were transported from the tribal villages in overcrowded buses. (I am sure that you recognize the demographic from the pages of several of Tom's books.)
One particular customer, an aged woman of unknown vintage, epitomises, I believe, a level of conservatism that we can all learn from.
She was a weekly regular, arriving together with other bus travellers every Friday afternoon. What made her stand out in my memory was the manner in which she made her purchases. Together with the other shoppers she would stand in line (a very long one in most cases - hot, flat and crowded!). Unlike other shoppers she would only request a single item at a time, assumably in order of priority. Tendering the damp currency she stored close to her chest, she would carefully count out the change and return to the beginning of the line. Once again she would make a single puchase, this time for item 2 on her list. This procedure was repeated many times during each visit, until she had no change left to count, at which point she would return to the bus. Finding her behaviour both confusing and annoying I questioned one of the shop assistants - an old man who had worked in the store since the beginning of time. He responded by telling me that this woman, with the wisdom of age, had learned to only buy exactly what she needed - and could pay for at that time. As she did not really understand the true cost of each item she made a single purchase at a time, after which she was able to establish her next priority in terms of purchase. This contrasted with the spending patterns of younger shoppers whose aspirations led them to establish 'credit lines' - the old story of owing your soul to the company store!
The lesson that I believe we can learn from this story is that we really need to question the true cost of how and where we are spending our global resources, and what we will be able to do with what is left once the spending has been done.
April 23rd 2009, 1:53 pm
Dear Mr. Friedman
I do not know whether this is the right place to mention it. This is an article I wrote.
Some media publications from India recently presented approximate break-up of expenses for the current Parliamentary elections in the country. The approximate total cost of the election, including the costs of poll machinery, print ads, canvassing and travelling, banners and posters, electronic campaign, meetings and rallies, cash-for-votes and freebies, is said to be Rs.115b (about $2.3 b). These publications have also referred to it as more expensive than the US elections of 2008. This could be due to two possible reasons: one, the population of the country and the infrastructural investment it requires and two, the number of different ideologies based on caste, religion and region and the number of political parties born out of it.
Yet, coming in the mid of a crisis so bad that only a countable few remember seeing a bigger crisis than this, the 2009 Elections are extravagant and are tantamount to being irresponsible to the society. How could we have reduced the budget of the most extravagant election anywhere in the world? One key issue here is not just the recession, but the carbon footprint left behind by a huge election.
For banners and posters, the estimated expense by all parties put together is Rs.15b (approx. $300m). Placing banners and posters in public places is banned under the current Election Commission’s model code of conduct. However, the Election Commission’s hands are full and many days pass before it can order the removal of these posters and banners. Canvassing and Travelling is estimated to take around Rs.30b ($600m) and that includes the expenses for cars, buses, helicopters and aircrafts. Politicians travel from meeting to meeting and rally to rally, leaving behind a carbon footprint that is way beyond normal.
I guess that would wipe off all the benefits we achieved through the Earth Hour 2009, a few weeks back. The problem with elections in India, or elections in most big countries, is that the government is yet to wake up to eco-friendly practices in conducting them. In India, the posters and banners are printed in sub-standard small-scale industries and they are extraordinary income for the rural masses in such times as this. But, the amount of paper spent on these printing calls for attention. The Election Commission is a powerful agency. It stops bad campaign practices and it stops discriminatory remarks from contesting politicians. Nevertheless, it is yet to form eco-friendly guidelines in the model code of conduct of Parliamentary elections. If eco-friendly practices can be implemented in elections in India, it can be implemented anywhere.
An eco-friendly election could reduce the amount of travelling. For party meetings, people from different parts of the country can be organized through video-conferencing. An eco-friendly election can compel the parties to print their banners and posters only on recycled paper. An eco-friendly Election Commission can fine the political parties, if they don’t clean up the mess created after each political rally or public meeting. The eco-friendly Election Commission can also ban the use of loudspeakers mounted on cars, which go about in every nook and corner of the country, propagating with the aid of parody songs and voiceovers. At my best estimate, at least 25% of the current expenses could have been saved with eco-friendly practices in the current elections.
The current elections close in under a month's time. The results will come out on May 16. I hope the new government will take up the eco-friendly issue closely and pave way for all elections in the future to be conducted with the environment in mind. Also, India is a country where more than 40% of her inhabitants live under the poverty line. In a country like this, any savings in expenditure could be used to bring about sustainable development in the future.
[I have read Hot, Flat and Crowded and absolutely follow what you say. I hope we all wake up soon.]
For more writings by Suhail Rasheed, visit http://suhailrasheed.wordpress.com
April 23rd 2009, 12:05 pm
Your latest book " hot, flat and crowded" is truly cherishing...:)
Njoyed...every bit of insights ..but one fact that kept me pondering is d missing dimension of water crisis....i guess if there is going to be "world war it mite be fact due to water crisis"
I see water and energy crisis are intergral..i look forward if you put forward some resounding insight into the same.
Anywzyz ..ur inisght are very powerful!.
April 22nd 2009, 12:08 am
Tom,
Tonight (Sunday April 19) on CBS "60 Minutes" they will do a segment on "Cold Fusion". I'm fairly convinced that Cold Fusion is the solution to the energy problem we have - it will replace oil, gasoline, coal etc. Ask you technical friends to take a close look at the technology. I'm an engineer and a long time researcher in this field.
Jeff
April 19th 2009, 2:23 pm
Tom,
By better understanding of the balancing capacity of Mother Nature, we can leverage the underutilized human potential. Carbon dioxide generating sources (such a burning of hydrocarbons and energizing of most of the living species by consuming carbohydrates) need to offset by carbon dioxide consuming processes such as photosynthesis to support vegetation and plants growth. Two third of the planet is covered by water with high salinity, biological growth that can be sustained in this environment need to be developed and promoted. Unfortunately,the imbalance is contributing to some of the disturbaces we are experiencing. The social and commercial universe need to be guided by market and public policy initiatives to seek this balance. The role of the arbirageurs in such pursuits need to made public and kept explicit. The financial arbitrgeurs that created the current mess, exploited the opaqueness by creating complex transactional instruments and dominating the the market of such instruments. It has been one Big Gambling Casino where house(arbitrageur) always wins in the long run and they thought they had! People in developing countries need help, are a source and reserve of huge economic opportunity for the developed world. Media has a big role in educating, informing, and putting the sunshine on effective remedies. Unfortunatey, that does not line up with the commercial intetersts of those in the media business!
April 16th 2009, 1:44 pm
Four out of the past five recessions followed oil shocks, and the IEA now warns of $200 a barrel oil by 2010; a global depression may follow. The U.S. needs a radically different energy policy to address volatile oil & gas prices, global warming, and a shrinking economy-- and fast. Most purported solutions are either too small to matter or have a fatal flaw.
---Hydroelectric power is low-cost, but cannot be expanded.
---Geothermal power is only available in a few spots, and likewise cannot be expanded.
---Biomass as currently practiced (ethanol or soybean diesel) produces such small gains in net-energy that no amount of farmland could contribute significantly to reducing fossil fuel consumption.
---The average capacity factor for photovoltaic solar in the U.S. is 14%; wind 27%. The fatal flaw is that battery technology is not sufficient to store sporadic and unreliable power coming in off the grid for when it isn't sunny or windy.
---And finally, while the world still has a lot of coal, we have yet to demonstrate large-scale, long-term storage of CO2.
Luckily, we won't have to live in the dark or melt all the glaciers. As argued in Tom Blees's "Prescription for the Planet," one solution exists: nuclear fission. Generation IV fast reactors could provide 100-300 times the energy per ton of uranium, or even use existing energy in nuclear waste as fuel. The world desperately needs a massive source of reliable, long-lasting, low-pollution energy. And nuclear power may be 'all that stands' between civilization and its alternatives.
April 15th 2009, 6:49 pm
great article from 2007.
can american capitalism be green?
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/05/1...
April 15th 2009, 12:37 pm
Tom-have you ever been near a wind-energy installation? The land is not attractive, not quiet, not usefull, and off limits to all but the workers maintaining the windmills, PERMANENTLY. (or at least as long as you want to pay extra for the power) When you figure the number of windmills needed, and experience the resistance of those who will have to live with them, you will know that wind power will shortly go the route of corn based ethanol. John Bozeman
April 13th 2009, 3:48 pm
I have been following Mr. Friedman's writing since "From Beirut to Jerusalem". "The World is Flat" did a brilliant job of presenting facts and telling America to pull its act together. The same is true for "Hot, Flat and Crowded".
I would like to know what Mr. Friedman and the other readers here think about student debt. I think the elimination - cancelation of student debt would have two very positive effects on the economy. First, it would free up hundreds of dollars for thousands of people every month. This money would flow into real economy. Second, it would give people the courage to demand better pay and conditions. Third, many of the numerous people with brilliant ideas - ideas for renewable energy, new economy and other social agendas - could pursue them. It would free a generation and its ideas.
I'm an optimist. I know this generation can and will do great things, if they are just given the freedom and the chance. Right now we have the chance - all we need is the freedom.
April 13th 2009, 11:28 am
Four out of the past five recessions followed oil shocks, and the EIA now warns of $200 a barrel oil by 2010; a global depression may follow. The U.S. needs a radically different energy policy to address volatile oil & gas prices, global warming, and a shrinking economy-- and fast. Most purported solutions are either too small to matter or have a fatal flaw.
---Hydroelectric power is low-cost, but cannot be expanded.
---Geothermal power is only available in a few spots, and likewise cannot be expanded.
---Biomass as currently practiced (ethanol or soybean diesel) produces such small gains in net-energy that no amount of farmland could contribute significantly to reducing fossil fuel consumption.
---The average capacity factor for photovoltaic solar in the U.S. is 14%; wind 27%. The fatal flaw is that battery technology is not sufficient to store sporadic and unreliable power coming in off the grid for when it isn't sunny or windy.
---And finally, while the world still has a lot of coal, we have yet to demonstrate large-scale, long-term storage of CO2.
As argued in Tom Blees's "Prescription for the Planet," one solution exists: nuclear fission. Generation IV fast reactors could provide 100-300 times the energy per ton of uranium, or even use existing energy in nuclear waste as fuel. The world needs a massive source of reliable, long-lasting, low-pollution energy. And nuclear power may be 'all that stands' between civilization and its alternatives.
April 12th 2009, 2:25 am
George--
But where will the energy come from for desalinization?
April 12th 2009, 2:25 am
In reading Mr. Friedman's works and those
of other serious environmentalists,I am
always struck by one practical and power-
ful solution to the problems of overcrow-
ding and polution that is never really
investigated. Massive desalinization would go a long ways toward improving the plan- et. About 90% of the human population lives on only 4% of the land mass. What if
it were spread out,forests planted,wild- life introduced,etc. An unlimited supply of clean water would make this possible--
and the benefits would clearly outweigh the initial high costs.
April 12th 2009, 2:01 am
Tom,
On page 327 is the following "You can create a carbon advantage for your company in two ways," explains Douglas: "First, ;you can use efficiency and resource reduction to provide a fundamental cost advantage in your operations and products. .......
Douglas is a con man and you are too, since one dosen't create a carbon advantage unless you REDUCE CARBON! The Prius does NOT reduce carbon!
More importantly, reducing CO2 will be harmful and not helpful! CO2 is required for life to exist on this planet and more of it helps plant life and increases crop yields! It has cooled for about 45 of the past 68 years and CO2 is certainly not causing any global warming!
Please do some real scientific research and then provide that science to the public and the idiots in the present administration, like Holdren and Salazar, so that the economy will have some reasonable chance to recover and put people back to work!
April 11th 2009, 8:24 pm
EIA: world oil shock imminent, and an even greater global depression will follow:
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/48582
Obama is aware of this, I'm sure, but doesn't want to spread panic. We're going to need a green revolution, and fast.
April 10th 2009, 3:24 am
Land Reform...
What are you taking about? You need to write more clearly.
Try to rewrite your sentences so they are more concise and compact. Too much rambling and ranting with no clear ideas conveyed.
By the way, population will never be steady-state so try not to stress out about it. Try not to take people who claim to have an ultimate plan for the world too seriously. Many of them do not really have good intentions. The Second Law of Thermodynamics will always hold so try not to get too stressed out when entropy increases. Also, the sun will most likely incinerate the earth at some point in the future.
April 9th 2009, 8:00 pm
Our monetary system makes us compete against and steal from each other to create more interest on debt in order to create more power with interest for the controllers of the federal reserve and our corporate fascist government which has been the world's government for some time now. The monetary system is a one dimensional idea about reality and distribution of power which Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, and Zeitgeist addendum have some opinions about. This system has failed all of us.
The wasted energy or entropy used to create more debt and interest can be seen in all our stealing from others and energy sucking institutions: prisons, military, urban sprawl, universities and all their consuming boxes that burn the uninspired false credit or usury of oil to create the dollars of debt that power our false freedom sucking gods of reality. Please look up for a future and head towards your intuition of light and thank god for the internet - governments' successor.
Recycling cities, communities, and education, so that we can honor and respect the energy from the sun and the honesty and self-reliance it brings is the only idea that swims naturally as a steady state population controlled existence.
Let's not be sinners who will always suffer in the ignorance of victimizing consumption. A James Kunstleresque comeuppance will have to be paid in full at some point because there is no future in an illusion. And as usual we our pushed and shoved by the least most unimaginative and unskilled among us.
Light, must be our creativity at the end of this tunnel.
April 9th 2009, 7:06 pm
Hey John,
You just don't understand. Tom Friedman is a genius who can guide the vast masses of peons (like us) to sustainable utopia. He needs to be able to fly around in jets so he can get his message out and teach us. Your practicle solutions (driving less if fuel is more expensive, living in a smaller house to cut down on the power bill) are exactly what he wants everyone to do, because he wants to have less congestion on the freeways he drives on, and more room on the airplanes he flys on.
It seems like Friedman game is too make generally loose connections and observations between things he really doesn't understand deeply, weave them into an "aha see how clever I am" idea, and then sell a story about it. Sort of a wanna-be scientist who's really an English major.
April 9th 2009, 7:00 pm
Tom-your a pretty ok writer but, i'm afraid. you don't realize the difference between what you say and what you do. You want to reduce CO2 ? fine, quit flying all around the world in jets. How many square feet of space/person does your family have? Extra homes? Vacation travel? You want to tax carbon? why wait for the tax law? just calculate what you think your fair share is and send it in! In the mean time, I will keep on trying to do what makes sense. If fuel is high (without artificial tax increases) I will buy a vehicle that gets better mileage. (I already have)and I won't bring any new people into the world ! (I haven't and I have helped raise two children) Take a drive out of the city and talk to some real people who make real things for a living and get back to me.
April 9th 2009, 2:41 pm
What is the cause of the great disruption? Could the global recession be the result of decreased global oil production? This video by pulitzer prize winning chemist Rick Smalley predicts just that, and if we don't act soon, it could be far worse. see 22 minutes in:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=39122...
Could solar power the world? Even with all its limitations, it may be our best bet.
April 9th 2009, 4:04 am
I think the problem is in the pre-supposition that we need growth. Africa needs to grow, but does Europe or the US? Isn't growth what got us into this problem in the first place?
Obviously the poor can't stay poor, but given the vast inequalities in the world, the most expedient way to raise people out of poverty is to create a level playing field through equitable redistribution mechanisms. Progressive taxation, cap and trade, intelligent subsidising, the so-called Tobin Tax, are all ways to channel the wealth to the poor without compromising anyone's lifestyle.
April 8th 2009, 10:01 am
Post new comment